Abwägung von Freiheit und Sicherheit: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung der grund- und menschenrechtlichen Vorgaben in Deutschland und im Vereinigten Königreich
Object category:
Hochschulschriften
Person/Institution:
Publisher:
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Place of publication:
Baden-Baden
Date:
2020
Extent, illustration, format:
1 Online-Ressource (387 S.;)
Language:
Deutsch
Providing institution:
Additional information
Abstract:
Terroristische Attentate stellen die Prinzipientreue westlicher Demokratien immer wieder auf die Probe. Die Ereignisse des 11. September 2001 haben in Deutschland eine langjährige Sicherheitsdebatte ausgelöst und Zweifel an der Rationalität der Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung und der verfassungsrechtlichen Güterabwägung wiederbelebt. Im Vereinigten Königreich haben die Anschläge dagegen einen Entwicklungsschub bei der Menschenrechtsanwendung und menschenrechtlichen Abwägung bewirkt. In seiner rechtsvergleichenden Arbeit untersucht der Autor anhand der Abwägung von Freiheit und Sicherheit, welche Lehren sich aus der britischen Menschenrechtsanwendung und -entwicklung für die deutsche Grundrechtsanwendung ziehen lassen.
Terrorist attacks have tested the liberal values of Western democracies again and again. The events of September 11th, 2001 have triggered a long-standing security debate in Germany and have revived doubts about the rationality of the established principles of proportionality and balancing. In the United Kingdom, on the other hand, the attacks have put to the test the human rights act and have boosted human rights doctrine and jurisprudence. In his comparative work, the author examines, on the basis of the consideration of freedom and security, which lessons can be learned from the British application of human rights since 9/11 for the German security debate and for the application of fundamental rights under German Basic Law.
Terrorist attacks have tested the liberal values of Western democracies again and again. The events of September 11th, 2001 have triggered a long-standing security debate in Germany and have revived doubts about the rationality of the established principles of proportionality and balancing. In the United Kingdom, on the other hand, the attacks have put to the test the human rights act and have boosted human rights doctrine and jurisprudence. In his comparative work, the author examines, on the basis of the consideration of freedom and security, which lessons can be learned from the British application of human rights since 9/11 for the German security debate and for the application of fundamental rights under German Basic Law.
Object text:
Paolo Ramadori
Gesehen am 26.05.2020
Dissertation Bucerius Law School Hamburg 2019
Gesehen am 26.05.2020
Dissertation Bucerius Law School Hamburg 2019
Access and usage options
Contact
Universität Erfurt
Forschungsbibliothek Gotha
Schloss Friedenstein
Schlossplatz 1
99867 Gotha
+49 361 737-5540
bibliothek.gotha(at)uni-erfurt.de
Forschungsbibliothek Gotha
Schloss Friedenstein
Schlossplatz 1
99867 Gotha
+49 361 737-5540
bibliothek.gotha(at)uni-erfurt.de
Administrative details
Created:
2023-04-14
Last changed:
2022-03-24
Added to portal:
2023-04-14
Feedback
Our data sets are in constant development. If you have additional information about this object or discovered an error, please write to us. Information on privacy policy